09 January 2012

Reel Injun Reflections

Reel Injun follows Neil Diamond (not the singer) as he traces the history of Native American portrayal in film. My initial response was positive, although the high note at the end rang slightly false. Diamond’s quest to end positively left the declared salvation of Native American film feeling hasty, and required omitting any mention of reservation conditions, which were dropped after being discussed earlier in the film.

Since movies have existed for over a century, and Diamond includes many other historical events and background details, there is more content to cover than could be comfortably fit into an hour and a half documentary. A valiant effort is attempted, and indeed I hardly noticed the rush until further reflection prompted by Andrew Schenker’s review. In mentioning the hurried speed of the film, he touched on several car trip stops that I had forgotten even occurred. For example, he shows young Native American children a Western movie from his own childhood, wondering at their reactions, but then moves on before interviewing any of the children.

Overall, however, I was left with a strong sense of how poorly white Americans have portrayed Native Americans in film, swinging from stereotype to stereotype, infusing American society with the same perfunctory impressions. Through showing clips of old and new movies and then discussing or revealing their prejudiced assumptions, Diamond instilled in me an awareness of how erroneously different people groups are portrayed by Hollywood. A John Wayne film isn’t so harmless after all, and I can’t imagine Hollywood does a much better job accurately portraying Chinese or Indian people. Thus this documentary has stimulated me to more closely analyze multiethnic movies, distinguishing between the good and the bad, the Kingdom and the Empire, instead of just swallowing it all.

The Ides of March

The Ides of March is a thrilling movie that looks deeply into the nature of politics. In this movie, Stephen Meyers (Ryan Gosling) is a successful campaign manager for presidential nominee Mike Morris (George Clooney). However, in the midst of Morris's campaign, Meyers discovers that Morris has cheated on his wife with one of his interns. After Meyers is fired for talking to the opposing presidential nominee's campaign manager in secret, he decides the one way to receive back his position is to threaten to reveal Morris's secret affair. After Meyers threatens the president, the film quickly takes on many twists and turns until it finally reveals a very suspenseful ending.

This movie displays how humans tend to let their greed and selfishness get the best of them as they strive for power and pleasure. This fact is evident when Stephen Meyers decides to threaten Morris to regain his status in Morris's presidential campaign. Although Meyers is rightfully fired, he still cannot take the dreadful news of his firing in stride. Because of his selfish desires, he eventually accidentally bring the intern to commit suicide and gets one of Morris's advisers fired from his beloved job. However, this is not the only example of how our human nature is corrupt. Morris also shows his true colors as he cheats on his supportive wife with one of his interns. Because of this act, Morris is eventually forced to be under Meyers' command throughout his campaign. These examples of a human's corrupt nature display how humans have been far from perfect ever since the Fall of Adam and Eve. It also portrays how humans struggle to live in a way that aligns with the Kingdom of God as they go throughout their daily lives. Although our purpose is to live in a way that is pleasing to God, this film, as well as our own lives, show that it is impossible to live that way on a daily basis.

Discussion Questions
1. What are some ways we can fight the selfish desires that are part of our human nature?
2. Do you believe that this film can help us correct our flaws as humans or does it just merely show us our flaws?
3. What do you think Meyers decides to do at the end of the movie (only applicable to those who watched this movie)?

America the Beautiful

On January 10 we are going to be watching the documentary "America the Beautiful." This film depicts America's obscene obsession with beauty and appearance. The director Darryl Roberts show clips from the past and interviews with everyday people. There is a great importance in getting answers from real people; it yields a response that causes the views to really think about the issues.

Roger Ebert gives his opinions on the film in this insightful review. He gives a bit of the background story to what makes this film what it is. This is a serious review that breaks down the pieces that make up the film

Here is another review that had some very positive things to say about the film. America the Beautiful was given 4.5 out of 5 stars on this review.

I just thought that I would include this Q&A with the director, Darryl Roberts to get some understanding about what the director was actually expecting when he came up with the idea for this film.

this is the preview for the film

08 January 2012

Hair; We all have it

On January 9th we
will be watching Good Hair, a documentary by Chris Rock looking at the way
people, especially African-Americans, look at hair and the power it has over
people and the way we look at others.

Now Chris Rock is an actor and comedian, so he does have
some credibility on the big screen. However, he is only doing this documentary
in regards to a question his three year old daughter asked him, “daddy, why don’t
I have good hair?” so from there we can imagine that Mr. Rock probably has a
bit of a bias in telling the story of the hair industry.

There are two articles containing reviews of the movie Good
Hair, you can read the first by Stephen Cole of the Globe and Mail at this link: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/good-hair/article1324904/
And a second by Betsy Sharkey of the Los Angeles Times at this link:
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/oct/09/entertainment/et-good-hair9



The Trailer for the movie you can watch by following this link:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/good-hair/article1324904/

also feel free to take a look at some of the clips from the movie they have linked to the trailer. I took a lot from these clips to make the discussion questions, so watching them might be helpful.

07 January 2012

Capitalism: A Love Story

On Tuesday, January 10th, we'll be watching Capitalism: A Love Story in the 1st VR lobby. Released in 2009, director Michael Moore invites us to explore the impact of corporate influence on the lives of Americans.

Mr. Moore, of course, is notorious for his polarizing opinions which almost always provoke mixed reviews. Manohla Dargis of The New York Times offers a critique of the film, exhaustively stating "in the end, what is to be done? After watching Capitalism, it beats me." You can find the article here.

Alternatively, Xan Brooks of The Guardian gave the film 4/5 stars in his review. Moore, he says "has done a fine job in ferreting out the human stories behind the headlines." For any more information on the film you can visit the official website here.



"There's got to be some kind of a rebellion between the people that have nothing and the people who have it all."

The Ides of March

George Clooney’s new political thriller The Ides of March follows staffer Stephen Meyers on his path from innocence. Meyers is working on the presidential campaign of governor Mike Morris, whom he starts the movie earnestly believing in as the last solution to America’s problems—the real deal president. Yet the film questions several virtues as Morris’s flaws are revealed, dragging down Meyers’s sincerity, so that the last true “savior” figures in politics descend to the masses of corruption.

This film broadcasts disillusionment with the human race as it tarnishes the figures it first asked the audience to love. While the Kingdom acknowledges that humans are corrupt, it also holds that humans are image-bearers of God, and so while everyone contains some shadow, everyone also contains some light. The Ides of March leaves no redeeming qualities or hint of goodness in the nature of man. Through showing the transformation of Meyer and disclosing the scandal of Morris, it is almost as if Clooney is shouting: “See! See! Even those individuals who you think are so angelic fail in the end.” The Ides of March ends at the pit of corruption from which a typical narrative would rise to conclude, paralleling Creation to the Fall, but abandoning the audience there instead of carrying them on to Redemption and Restoration.

The Empire would like you to believe one of two things: either the world isn’t so bad, or it’s terrible, but that’s the way things are, and it’s time for you to play the game. This drama shoots down the first option after initially inviting you to believe in it, but leaves the protagonist Meyer committed to the second view. My reaction to the movie however, is almost a resistance, and a desire to prove this wrong; thereby, The Ides of March promotes the Kingdom by inviting the audience to question the reality of human nature.

Discussion questions:

1) What do you think Clooney’s view of human nature is?

2) What are the parallels and distinctions between Meyer’s apocalypse (epiphany) and the apocalypse we are called to?

06 January 2012

Reel Injun

In a culture that tends to view Native Americans as either the "bad guys" in a John Wayne film, or as mystical legends like Disney's Pocahontas, Reel Injun is a documentary that attempts to cover the presence and stereotypes of Native Americans in Hollywood. It was released in 2009 to mixed reviews, and won several awards including the Canada Award. 

Though most reviewers lauded the filmmakers for calling attention to a significant problem, a complaint many had with the documentary was that it covered too much history too quickly, rendering it less effective than it could have been. One example of such a review can be seen here. Others, though, like this one, called the documentary "impeccably researched and crafted."

Reel Injun is a challenging and thought-provoking film that raises many good questions about stereotypes, and how much media can shape both our culture and our perception of other cultures.

A preview for the film can be seen here.

Corn...It's What's for Dinner

On Wednesday, January 11, in Schultze Room 256, I will be showing the film King Corn.

This film discusses the impact of corn on our society, especially in the fast food industry. Through humor and a self-experiment, two college friends plant an acre of corn deep in the corn belt to follow the life of corn from seed to plate.

For more information, and other facts about King Corn, visit this site.

The trailer (and actually the full movie) can be found on IMDB.
This film got very high reviews, including 96% good on rotten tomatoes. Many praise it for it's light feeling and learn-as-they-go story of the two unlikely farmers.

Here are a few reviews that I found:
Run time: 88 minutes

Plan on coming at 8:00pm, and we will be done by 10 (end of open house) Feel free to bring a snack!

27 January 2010

House: The Tyrant (S603)

Through out the pervious five seasons of House MD, addiction and all of the unsightly nuances acquainted with it drove the show down roads many popular television shows have yet to travel. Gregory House, trusted Vicodin to ease and, perhaps mask, physical pain caused by a dying leg. I have been an avid viewer of the show for…a long time, and over the years I, and many others, have watched House plummet to the depths of despair and, during season 6, climb over his addiction. House, as defined by pervious seasons, is ruthlessly ‘independent’, self-serving, pragmatic and conniving. With a dark wit, he drives the show to places and dilemmas that often make House think about his world view and leave the viewers to think over the problems themselves.

This, I believe, is where the true heart of the show lies: the ability to question. While House’s attitude towards humanity has been described as ‘misanthropic’ his real driving force comes from needing to solve ‘the puzzle’, to find the truth. This idea is very apocalyptic in a society that often calls for ‘unity’. However it must be said that House is not the ‘poster-boy’ of the Kingdom. In fact, his strong sense of independence, extreme cynicism and dislike of human contact strongly contradicts the goals of the Kingdom as well as suggesting a particular form of modernism. While the drive to find the truth is incredibly important to God’s Kingdom, House rejects religion avidly and tries to find objectivity through his medium: science. David Shore’s character can continue to be striped down and examined, however I will move on.

This particular episode, The Tyrant, focuses strongly on the idea of righteous killing verses ‘just doing your job’. Dibala, a ruthless dictator, becomes ill and is treated by ‘House’s Team’ lead by Forman. The dictator is rumored to be planning an ‘ethnic cleansing’ of the Sitibi people in his kingdom. This question is huge and is often not thought about by the normal human being with a normal work life. However, as people of the Kingdom we must constantly be in question and challenge ourselves and our faith. It is this reason that House MD is incredibly important to popular culture.

1. I have praised House MD as a show, however the main character loudly proclaims to be an Atheist. What are some of the unpleasant things about this show that cannot be over looked?
2. If Dibala was in your living room, what would you do?

25 January 2010

Cultural Artifact - Jayesslee

Jayesslee (link) are two twenty-three year old identical twin sisters, Janice and Sonia Lee. They are Koreans who are currently living in Australia and are both pursuing music. They do not have an album out (yet), but they have many videos on their youtube channel and are a very talented duo. I think that these two show the human purpose of giving all glory to God. At the beginning and end of their songs they always say "be blessed" and they are not afraid to express their faith. I think that they are a wonderful testimony because of the songs they sing and of the short message they say before their songs. It is also obvious that they have become more popular lately and they are really thankful to God for it because they recognize that their amazing musical talent comes from Him. They reveal the Kingdom of God in a way that shows that God gives everyone a spiritual gift, no matter what it may be, and when we use it to glorify and testify His name, we will be greatly blessed. They also reveal that we can be witnesses anywhere and bless others through anything, in their case, it's through music on youtube.

Discussion Questions:
1. What are your spiritual gifts that God has blessed you with?
2. How can you reach out to others through simple activities?