This New York Times review of Good Hair pretty accurately describes my
reaction to the film. I thought Chris Rock brought up many interesting facts
and showed a good look into the industry of hair. However I was slightly let
down by the film, because Rock brought light to many problematic practices but
offered no solutions. The entire feel of the film seemed too light and humorous
for the severity of the problem it was addressing. Some of the problematic
things Chris Rock brought up but offered no solution to was the practice of
applying “creamy crack” or relaxing to the scalps of young black girls and
adults and the expensive, high maintenance hair product weaves. Another issue
Rock raised was the fact that African Americans make up 20% of the population
but make up 80% of the hair market consumers. Yet they do not own many of the
hair companies. Mostly Asians and Caucasians own these companies and
manufactures. So black people spend the most money on hair products but Asians
and white people profit from hair products. I would have enjoyed the film more
if it would have offered some solutions to the audience instead of just leaving
us with a big issue and no proper way to respond to it. As far as how this film
has prompted me to make changes in my life, I think as a white person my only
response can be trying to change the false idea that white is right and
acknowledge the extent that white privilege affects my life. Having
white-looking hair should not influence whether or not someone gets an
interview or a job.
Thanks for sharing your observations, Grace.
ReplyDelete